Current:Home > MarketsCalifornia lawmakers to vote on plan allowing the state to buy power -TradeGrid
California lawmakers to vote on plan allowing the state to buy power
View
Date:2025-04-28 01:27:27
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers were scheduled to vote Thursday on whether to give Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration permission to buy massive amounts of electricity, a move aimed at avoiding blackouts by shoring up the state’s power supply while jumpstarting the West Coast’s fledgling offshore wind industry.
Five companies paid roughly $750 million last year to lease areas off the California coast to build wind turbines. Collectively, those projects could generate enough electricity to power 3.5 million homes, helping the state avoid blackouts during extreme heat waves that have routinely strained the electrical grid of the nation’s most populous state.
But so far, the state’s largest utility companies have not been willing to commit to buying power from projects like those because it would cost too much money and take too long to build. In addition to building the wind turbines, the projects will require improvements at the state’s ports and new power lines to transport the energy from the ocean to the land.
“This is a major, generational series of investments that need to happen, and there’s a real risk it won’t if we can’t provide more certainty,” said Alex Jackson, director of American Clean Power Association, which represents the companies trying to build the wind projects.
The bill before lawmakers Thursday would let the state buy the power. The money would come from a surcharge imposed on Californians’ electricity bills. State regulators would decide how much this charge would be. Consumers would not pay it until the wind projects are up and running, likely several years from now.
California already has among the highest electricity rates in the country.
“This legislation ... means that every single ratepayer in California, no matter where you live, is going to pay for this,” said Republican state Sen. Brian Dahle, who opposes the bill.
Supporters argue the bill will save people money in the long run on their electric bills. California has a law requiring all of its electricity to come from renewable or non-carbon sources by 2045. To do that, supporters say the state will have to invest in offshore wind projects, which typically generate the most power at night when solar energy is not as abundant.
Supporters say it would be more efficient for these offshore wind projects to sell all of their electricity to the state instead of a selling pieces of it to multiple utility companies, helping to control costs and keep rates lower.
“The biggest threat to us meeting our climate goals between now and 2045 are rate impacts to rate payers,” Scott Wetch, a lobbyist representing various construction trade associations, told lawmakers in a recent public hearing. “(This bill) is the only way to bring down those costs on these large, complex, long lead time projects in order to minimize the rate impacts.”
The bill gives the Department of Water Resources the authority to purchase the power — but not forever. Their authority would expire in 2035. Lawmakers would have to vote again to extend it.
California has moved quickly to end its reliance on fossil fuels in recent years. State regulators have OK’d rules banning the sale of most new gas-powered cars by 2035. But the state has struggled maintaining its clean energy values amid that transition.
An extreme heat wave in 2020 overwhelmed the state’s power grid, leaving hundreds of thousands of homes in the dark for a few hours over two days. Similar heat waves in the following summers prompted regulators to ask consumers to use less energy when demand was at its peak in the early evenings.
Newsom and the state Legislature have since spent $3.3 billion to build a “strategic reliability reserve” that included purchasing diesel-powered generators and extending the life of some gas-fired power plants that were scheduled to retire.
“There are things happening right now in energy policy that give me some pause about the efficacy of our strategy,” Democratic state Sen. Henry Stern lamented during a public hearing on the bill last week.
State law requires utility companies to have enough energy to meet demand. If they don’t, the bill would require those companies to pay a penalty. The Newsom administration has said this will prevent utilities from relying too much on the strategic reliability reserve, which uses gas-powered generators that pollute the air.
Alice Reynolds, president of the California Public Utilities Commission, said the state has completed more than 100 projects that have added 9,000 megawatts of new clean energy in the past three years. The bill lawmakers approved on Wednesday also includes provisions to fast-track new electric transmission projects.
“We need to act quickly and we need to really have all hands on deck,” Reynolds said.
veryGood! (61)
Related
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Climate activists in Germany to abandon gluing themselves to streets, employ new tactics
- Why Pilot Thinks He Solved Amelia Earhart Crash Mystery
- Real estate giant China Evergrande ordered by Hong Kong court to liquidate
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- David and Victoria Beckham Troll Themselves in the Most Hilarious Way
- The Bahamas pushes to reduce violence as the US Embassy warns of a spike in killings
- Alaska governor’s annual speech to lawmakers delayed as high winds disrupt flights
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Surviving Scandoval: Relive Everything That's Happened Since Vanderpump Rules Season 10
Ranking
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Alaska governor’s annual speech to lawmakers delayed as high winds disrupt flights
- Live updates | Israeli forces raid a West Bank hospital, killing 3 Palestinian militants
- Judge orders Oregon newspaper not to publish documents linked to Nike lawsuit
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- UAW chief Shawn Fain explains why the union endorsed Biden over Trump
- Gambling busts at Iowa State were the result of improper searches, athletes’ attorneys contend
- Pennsylvania high court revives case challenging limits on Medicaid coverage for abortions
Recommendation
Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Prince Harry’s lawyers seek $2.5 million in fees after win in British tabloid phone hacking case
Love streaming on Prime? Amazon will now force you to watch ads, unless you pay more
Russian opposition figure Kara-Murza moved to another prison, placed in solitary confinement again
What to watch: O Jolie night
Georgia’s prime minister steps down to prepare for national elections this fall
When a white supremacist threatened an Iraqi DEI coordinator in Maine, he fled the state
AP PHOTOS: As Carnival opens, Venice honors native son Marco Polo on 700th anniversary of his death